Free recoilers will argue differently on this matter and argue for the sake of a brake. This is a fault of the shooter, not the equipment. If your fundamentals are a little more on the "relaxed side" you may be penalized more with a suppressor. Apply the fundamentals, and it's very easy to keep your rifle on target through the follow through. Long story short, I never felt I was giving up much to a brake when shooting suppressed, after spending most of my shooting life shooting braked. Concussion has a huge effect on the body and mind, and even with adequate hearing protection, the concussion coming off of a brake can cause long term hearing damage. This is a big and often overlooked pro of shooting suppressed. The big upside to shooting suppressed is the mitigation of concussion. If you are properly applying the fundamentals, you should still be spotting all of your impacts. That said, I don't believe shooting suppressed is that much of a hindrance, especially with the proper application of fundamentals. With a brake, recoil is most efficiently mitigated and is over very quickly. Suppressed being a slow dwell while a brake (or unbraked, bare muzzle) is a sharp/rapid impulse. Of course, the recoil impulse is different between the two. I didn't realize how much I would enjoy it until I shot the 2018 quiet riot match, which is 100% suppressed. Is impact visibility and recoil management more important that concussion avoidance and good range-manners?Īs someone that has shot mostly with a muzzle brake, I readily welcome the thought of shooting fully suppressed. Has anyone else gone gone through this conundrum and willing to share your thoughts? Need to make this decision in time to solidify and lock in my zero, and have good ballistics/velocity information. and feeling like I should pull the ASR suppressor brake off my primary distance rifle (Masterpiece Arms 300-WMBA), skip the can, and get good with a good muzzle brake instead of using a can at this event. I'm traveling to a long range class in April to shoot out to (hopefully) 2,000 yards. That said, the guy at the bench next to me certainly gave me a few nasty looks since the side concussion was, um, impressive. But I decided to mount a Gen-3 Little Bastard muzzle brake on a new rifle (Tikka 6.5-CM), and I have to admit that the ability to see my impacts and get back on target, improved by orders of magnitude. I've sort of "defaulted" to using a suppressor, as it seemed the easier and more civilized choice for noise and concussion. LMTs come standard with A2 flash suppressors.I'm just getting into the really long distances, and I'm struggling with this one. they probably have a list by manufacturer/model name. seriously, check with the state on a specific model before you commit yourself. There are muzzle breaks that look like A2's but actually DONT suppress flash, and there are flash suppressors that don't look like flash suppressors. you should definately check with your state as to what is and what isn't considered a flash suppressor. the A1, A2, and all the other after market flash suppressors are all considered flash suppressors by the ATF. even if it's a muzzle break, if it suppresses flash the ATF considers it a flash suppressor. I live in a state where a FS is illegal, but a muzzle brake is not - have manufacturers ceased making the bottom slots so they are making MBs?uhh. This answer is more confusing - "a Muzzle brake dissipates the gases 360 degrees?" I though the purpose of the brake was to vent gasses upwards, to defeat muzzle rise, and the A2 birdcage has slots all the way around to lessen flash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |